Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Hoogeveen, Mariëtte; van Gelderen, Amos |
|---|---|
| Titel | What Works in Writing with Peer Response? A Review of Intervention Studies with Children and Adolescents |
| Quelle | In: Educational Psychology Review, 25 (2013) 4, S. 473-502Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1040-726X |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10648-013-9229-z |
| Schlagwörter | Forschungsbericht; Peer Influence; Peer Evaluation; Writing Instruction; Meta Analysis; Teaching Methods; Writing Skills; Cognitive Processes; Social Cognition; Instructional Effectiveness; Children; Adolescents |
| Abstract | Peer response is viewed as an important aspect of writing instruction. Several meta-studies indicated that peer response is effective. However, these studies did not focus on the specific aspects of peer response that made it effective. The present review analyzes the effects of instructional factors accompanying peer response in 26 studies on writing proficiency. Three theoretical perspectives are distinguished: a cognitive, a social-cognitive, and a genre perspective underlying the reviewed studies. In all studies, additional instruction in strategies, rules for interaction, genre knowledge, or a combination of these instructional aspects to writing with peer response is provided. Peer response with such additional instruction seems effective compared with individual writing. Recommendations for future investigations are directed to methodological issues for comparing the effects of separate instructional components for writing with peer response. In addition, it is advised to direct future studies towards more controlled research into the effects of instruction in genre knowledge on writing with peer response. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com |
| Begutachtung | Peer reviewed |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
