Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inChen, Tsuiping
TitelTechnology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes: A Research Synthesis
QuelleIn: Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29 (2016) 2, S. 365-397
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN0958-8221
DOI10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
SchlagwörterForschungsbericht; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Feedback (Response); Computer Assisted Instruction; Teaching Methods; Qualitative Research; Peer Evaluation; Writing Instruction; Academic Discourse; Computer Mediated Communication; Language Usage; Educational Research; Comparative Analysis; Second Language Instruction; Synchronous Communication; Asynchronous Communication; Grounded Theory; Group Dynamics; Journal Articles; Foreign Countries; Literature Reviews
AbstractSome studies on technology-supported peer feedback in the writing classroom claim that it reduces the threatening atmosphere caused by face-to-face interaction and that the discourse patterns and language use in the electronic feedback are more flexible than in spoken discourse. Others present a negative view that the comments generated from technology-supported interaction tend to be superficial and that technical problems reduce participant motivation in peer interaction. These contradictory results call for a systematic literature review of this topic. An exhaustive literature search in a variety of academic sources identified 95 studies from 1990 to 2010 dealing with peer feedback in English as a second or foreign language (ESL/EFL) writing classrooms. Of these, 54 contained qualitative data, 20 of which were specifically on computer-mediated peer feedback. Concentrating on these 20 articles, the researcher conducted comparative reviews of the characteristics, the pros and cons, and the differences between synchronous and asynchronous interaction for this mode of peer feedback, using Glaser and Strauss' Grounded Theory (1967) constant comparison method. Based on the findings, several main themes are identified and three implications involving pedagogy, group dynamics, and training for future research on this mode of peer feedback are discussed. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenRoutledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
BegutachtungPeer reviewed
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Computer Assisted Language Learning" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: