Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Reh, Sabine |
|---|---|
| Titel | Bildung und Wissenschaft in Freiheit - bedroht? Historische Rekonstruktionen und theoretische Reflexionen. |
| Quelle | In: Erziehungswissenschaft, 37 (2026) 72, S. 8-24Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext (2); PDF als Volltext (3) |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Dokumenttyp | online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0938-5363; 1862-5231 |
| DOI | 10.25656/01:35857 10.3224/ezw.v37i1.2 |
| URN | urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-358575 |
| Schlagwörter | Geschichte (Histor); Demokratie; Liberalismus; Wissenschaft; Wissenschaftsfreiheit; Akademische Freiheit; Hochschule; 19. Jahrhundert; 20. Jahrhundert |
| Abstract | Die Autorin fokussiert in ihrem Beitrag die historische Entwicklung von Wissenschaftsfreiheit im Kontext der liberalen Universitätskonzeption. Dabei macht sie u. a. deutlich, dass Wissenschaftsfreiheit zu keinem Zeitpunkt uneingeschränkt etabliert, sondern stets in einem Konfliktfeld aus Politik, Verwaltung und Organisation beschränkt wurde. (DIPF/Orig.). The text offers a critical reflection on the concept of academic freedom from historical and theoretical perspectives. It begins with a "liberal founding framework" dating to around 1800, in which education, freedom, and the university - particularly in Humboldt's thought - are closely intertwined. While this idea still shapes modern understandings of science, it proves insufficient for addressing contemporary debates. Historical analysis shows that academic freedom has never existed without conflict but has always been embedded in tensions between state, society, and institutional structures. Since the 20th century, these conditions have shifted significantly, in part due to the "scientification of the social": science has become deeply intertwined with political and social processes, generating new conflicts, especially between epistemic freedom and social responsibility. Examples from the 1960s and 1970s illustrate disputes over academic freedom, research control and state intervention. The text concludes that academic freedom should not be seen as a fixed state but as an open, contested space of discourse that requires continuous negotiation and active responsibility. (DIPF/Orig.). |
| Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
| Update | 2026/4 |