Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Stufflebeam, Daniel L. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Evaluation models. |
| Quelle | San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass (2001), 106 S. |
| Reihe | New directions for evaluation. 89 |
| Beigaben | Literaturangaben 140; Register |
| Zusatzinformation | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Monografie |
| ISBN | 0-7879-5755-0 |
| Schlagwörter | Evaluation; Methode; Bewertung |
| Abstract | This monograph identifies and assesses twenty-two approaches often employed to evaluate programs. These approaches, in varying degrees, are unique and cover most program evaluation efforts. Two of the approaches, reflecting the political realities of evaluation are often used illegitimately to falsely characterize a program's value and are labeled pseudo-evaluations. The remaining twenty approaches are typically used legitimately to judge programs and are divided into questions/methods- oriented approaches, improvement/accountability approaches, and social agenda/advocacy approaches. The best and most applicable of the program evaluation approaches appear to be Client-Centered/Responsive, Utilization-Focused, Decision/Accontability, Consumer-Oriented, Constructivist, Case Study, Outcome/Value-Added Assessment, and Accreditation, with the new Deliberative Democratic approach showing promise. (DIPF/Orig.). |
| Erfasst von | DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main |
| Update | 2003_(CD) |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
