Does Economic Education Make a Difference in Congress? How Economics Majors Vote on Trade

Autor/in	O'Roark, J. Brian
Titel	Does Economic Education Make a Difference in Congress? How Economics Majors Vote on Trade
Quelle	In: Journal of Economic Education, 43 (2012) 4, S.423-439 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0485
DOI	10.1080/00220485.2012.714319
Schlagwörter	Legislators; Federal Government; Majors (Students); Economics Education; Voting; Federal Legislation; International Trade; Foreign Countries; Colombia; Cuba; Oman; Peru; United States; Vietnam + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bundesregierung; Wirtschaftskunde; Abstimmung; Bundesrecht; Trade; International relations; Handel; Internationale Beziehungen; Ausland; Kolumbien; Kuba; USA
Abstract	The author of this article expands the background theory of voting to incorporate the undergraduate majors of members of Congress. Examining nine votes on trade across the 109th and 110th Congresses reveals that economics majors are the only category of college major to vote in favor of free trade in a predictable way. Controls for a variety of factors including ideology, race, campaign contributions, and the inclusion of votes specifically on Cuba fail to diminish the effect. While economics majors are more likely to take a free trade position, not every vote that presupposes a free trade outcome is supported by economics majors. On the issue of sugar subsidies, being an economics major does not influence the direction of a congressional member's vote. (Contains 6 notes and 6 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10