Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Tremblay, Carol Horton; Tremblay, Victor J. |
---|---|
Titel | The Neglect of Monotone Comparative Statics Methods |
Quelle | In: Journal of Economic Education, 41 (2010) 2, S.177-193 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0022-0485 |
Schlagwörter | Game Theory; Textbooks; Economics Education; Policy Analysis; Mathematics; College Curriculum; Predictive Measurement; Educational Trends; Change; Economic Impact; Teaching Methods; Comparative Analysis; Mathematics Education; Measurement Techniques |
Abstract | Monotone methods enable comparative static analysis without the restrictive assumptions of the implicit-function theorem. Ease of use and flexibility in solving comparative static and game-theory problems have made monotone methods popular in the economics literature and in graduate courses, but they are still absent from undergraduate mathematical economics courses and textbooks. In this article, the authors illustrate the generality of monotone comparative statics relative to the implicit function approach. For example, to sign the effect of a discrete policy shift on a choice variable, the marginal returns will increase with the policy parameter. They also apply monotone methods in game theory settings. As mathematical economics courses and majors gain popularity, incorporating monotone methods into curriculum and textbooks would provide a modern treatment of comparative static analysis. (Contains 8 figures and 23 notes.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Heldref Publications. 1319 Eighteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036-1802. Tel: 800-365-9753; Tel: 202-296-6267; Fax: 202-293-6130; e-mail: subscribe@heldref.org; Web site: http://www.heldref.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |