Examining the Effects of Classroom Discussion on Students' Comprehension of Text: A Meta-Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Murphy, P. Karen; Wilkinson, Ian A. G.; Soter, Anna O.; Hennessey, Maeghan N.; Alexander, John F.
Titel	Examining the Effects of Classroom Discussion on Students' Comprehension of Text: A Meta-Analysis
Quelle	In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2009) 3, S.740-764 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0663
DOI	10.1037/a0015576
Schlagwörter	Reading Comprehension; Discussion; Meta Analysis; Classroom Communication; Academic Ability; Teaching Methods; Critical Thinking; Thinking Skills; Skill Development; Reading Achievement + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Leseverstehen; Diskussion; Meta-analysis; Metaanalyse; Klassengespräch; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Kritisches Denken; Denkfähigkeit; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Leseleistung
Abstract	The role of classroom discussions in comprehension and learning has been the focus of investigations since the early 1960s. Despite this long history, no syntheses have quantitatively reviewed the vast body of literature on classroom discussions for their effects on students' comprehension and learning. This comprehensive meta-analysis of empirical studies was conducted to examine evidence of the effects of classroom discussion on measures of teacher and student talk and on individual student comprehension and critical-thinking and reasoning outcomes. Results revealed that several discussion approaches produced strong increases in the amount of student talk and concomitant reductions in teacher talk, as well as substantial improvements in text comprehension. Few approaches to discussion were effective at increasing students' literal or inferential comprehension and critical thinking and reasoning. Effects were moderated by study design, the nature of the outcome measure, and student academic ability. While the range of ages of participants in the reviewed studies was large, a majority of studies were conducted with students in 4th through 6th grades. Implications for research and practice are discussed. (Contains 2 figures and 5 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10