Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Akhtar, Nameera; Callanan, Maureen; Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Scholz, Barbara C. |
---|---|
Titel | Learning Antecedents for Anaphoric One |
Quelle | In: Cognition, 93 (2004) 2, S.141-145 (5 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0010-0277 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.12.002 |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Learning; Infants; Stimuli; Language Acquisition; Linguistic Input; Syntax |
Abstract | Lidz et al. [Lidz, J., Waxman, S., & Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: Experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months. Cognition, 89, B65-B73.] claim experimental substantiation of an argument from the poverty of the stimulus, in the sense of Pullum and Scholz [Linguist. Rev. 19 (2002) 9]. They cite a specific feature of English-the assignment of appropriate antecedents for anaphoric one-that cannot possibly be learned from experience because the evidence needed is found only in utterances of a type too rare to be encountered. Their argument involves three empirical claims. In this note we dispute all three. (Author). |
Anmerkungen | Elsevier Customer Service Department, 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126 (Toll Free); Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com. |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |