Designing Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: Analysis of Written and Oral Peer Feedback

Autor/inn/en	van den Berg, Ineke; Admiraal, Wilfried; Pilot, Albert
Titel	Designing Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: Analysis of Written and Oral Peer Feedback
Quelle	In: Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (2006) 2, S.135-147 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1356-2517
Schlagwörter	Peer Evaluation; Feedback; Writing Instruction; Evaluation Methods; Collaborative Writing; Foreign Countries; Student Participation; Evaluation Research; College Students; Netherlands + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Schreibunterricht; Ausland; Schülermitarbeit; Schülermitwirkung; Studentische Mitbestimmung; Evaluationsforschung; Collegestudent; Niederlande
Abstract	The nature of written and oral peer feedback will be described as it occurred in seven writing courses, each with a different design of peer assessment. In all courses, peer feedback was focused on evaluation, which is one of the four feedback functions. Feedback on structure was hardly provided. Relating feedback to design features, we suggest that feedback is adequate when (1) peer assessment has a summative (on the basis of a writing product) as well as a formative character (during the writing process); (2) the assessment is performed in small feedback groups; (3) the written feedback is orally explained and discussed with the receiver. (Author).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001. Tel: 212-216-7800; Fax: 212-564-7854; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10