Comparison of Curriculum Development Practices

Autor/in	Kelting-Gibson, Lynn M.
Titel	Comparison of Curriculum Development Practices
Quelle	In: Educational Research Quarterly, 29 (2005) 1, S.26-36 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0196-5042
Schlagwörter	Leitfaden; Unterricht; Lehrer; Educational Planning; Curriculum Development; Curriculum Design; Preservice Teachers; Instructional Design; Comparative Analysis; Lesson Plans; Models; Evaluation Methods; Knowledge Base for Teaching + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Lesson concept; Instruction; Unterrichtsentwurf; Unterrichtsprozess; Teacher; Teachers; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Bildungsplanung; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Lehrplangestaltung; Lessonplan; Lesson planning; Unterrichtsplanung; Analogiemodell; Teaching theory; Theory of teaching; Unterrichtstheorie
Abstract	Lesson and unit plans designed by preservice teachers who developed their plans using the backward design model or a traditional model of curriculum design were compared. Two independent raters scored 153 lesson and unit plans developed by preservice teachers in two different sections of Educational Planning and Management. The plans were evaluated using Danielson's Framework for Professional Practice by means of six components: demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy, demonstrating knowledge of students, selecting suitable instructional goals, demonstrating knowledge of resources, designing coherent instruction, and assessing student learning. Results included evidence that preservice teachers who were taught curriculum design using the backward design model outperformed preservice teachers who were taught curriculum design using a traditional model on all six components. (Author).
Anmerkungen	Behavioral Research Press, LLC, Grambling State University, Math Department, P.O. Box 1191, Grambling, LA 71245. Tel: 318-274-2425.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10