A Tool for Developing Guidelines for Institutional Policy: A 60 Indicator Inventory for Assessing the Age-Friendliness of a University

Autor/inn/en	Lim, Jin Seop; Park, Myung-Bae; O'Kelly, Christine H.; Knopf, Richard C.; Talmage, Craig A.
Titel	A Tool for Developing Guidelines for Institutional Policy: A 60 Indicator Inventory for Assessing the Age-Friendliness of a University
Quelle	In: Educational Gerontology, 49 (2023) 3, S.214-227 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Park, Myung-Bae)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0360-1277
DOI	10.1080/03601277.2022.2096326
Schlagwörter	Universities; Institutional Characteristics; Educational Indicators; Guidelines; Intergenerational Programs; College Environment; School Community Relationship; Lifelong Learning; Adult Students; Older Adults; Foreign Countries; Program Evaluation; Canada; United States; Asia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? University; Universität; Educational indicato; Bildungsindikator; Richtlinien; Hochschulumwelt; Life-long learning; Lebenslanges Lernen; Adult; Adults; Student; Students; Erwachsenenalter; Studentin; Schüler; Schülerin; Älterer Erwachsener; Ausland; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Kanada; USA; Asien
Abstract	This study seeks to develop Age-Friendly University (AFU) implementation guidelines to enable universities to self-identify their age-friendliness levels and establish specific strategies toward becoming an AFU. The survey was completed by primary leads for 26 AFUs-recognized institutions globally. The questionnaires included an inventory of 68 possible attributes of an AFU. The respondents were asked to (a) report the status of their institution in terms of performance on the attributes and (b) state the relative desirability of each attribute as a potential guideline for assessing the performance of AFU attributes. For institution's performance, 'Social engagement and support' had the highest (3.32) age-friendliness level, followed by an 'Age-friendly environment' (3.31), 'Administrative support' (3.15), Lifelong learning' (3.11), and 'Reflecting the needs of older people' (2.83). Furthermore, the overall score was highest in Canada (3.82), followed by Europe (3.51), the USA (3.14), and Asia (2.67). Among attributes, 'There are elevators in major buildings (that older adults use frequently)' was the highest (4.40); followed by 'The campus and surrounding environment in our school are clean for older adults to use' (4.28). We also asked participants about "the adequacy of the AFU as a guideline. 'Members of our university's community are respectful and friendly toward older adults' was the highest (4.43)." However, in this study, 8 attributes scored less than 3 points for appropriateness. Consequently, we condensed the instrument to 60 attributes. This study is novel in proposing guidelines to implement strategies to apply and operationalize the somewhat abstract concept of age-friendliness of universities. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01