Against Neutrality: Response to Cokelet

Autor/inn/en	Warren, Michael T.; Wright, Jennifer Cole; Snow, Nancy E.
Titel	Against Neutrality: Response to Cokelet
Quelle	In: Journal of Moral Education, 51 (2022) 1, S.111-116 (6 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Warren, Michael T.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0305-7240
DOI	10.1080/03057240.2022.2026091
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Moral Values; Ethics; Moral Development; Criticism; Books; Educational Philosophy; Values Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Moral value; Ethischer Wert; Ethik; Moralische Entwicklung; Kritik; Book; Buch; Monographie; Monografie; Bildungsphilosophie; Erziehungsphilosophie; Werterziehung
Abstract	We appreciate and respond to Cokelet's thoughtful criticisms of our book. First, he points to deliberative forms of practical wisdom as objectionable to anti-rationalist's. In response, we point to non-conscious (yet complex) forms of deliberation that occur as individuals automatically process and respond to virtue-relevant stimuli. Second, Cokelet states that reflecting upon one's life as a whole may be unnecessary and ineffective for virtue development. We clarify that reflection is not the only means of virtue cultivation, and even flawed reflection is likely helpful. Finally, Cokelet recommends aiming for 'theoretical neutrality' by recasting these core tenets as empirical hypotheses. We argue against a neutral perspective that accommodates anti-rationalist views that we think are on the wrong track. Non-neutral claims help generate testable empirical hypotheses that can move virtue science forward. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01