Principals May Inflate Teacher Evaluation Scores to Achieve Important Goals

Autor/inn/en	Jones, Eli; Bergin, Christi; Murphy, Bridget
Titel	Principals May Inflate Teacher Evaluation Scores to Achieve Important Goals
Quelle	In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34 (2022) 1, S.57-88 (32 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Jones, Eli)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1874-8597
DOI	10.1007/s11092-021-09366-8
Schlagwörter	Principals; Teacher Evaluation; Scores; Accuracy; Classroom Observation Techniques; Feedback (Response); Teacher Morale; Teacher Administrator Relationship; Time Management + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Principal; Schulleiter; Teacher appraisal; Lehrerbeurteilung; Teacher; Teachers; Morale; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Moral; Zeitmanagement
Abstract	A concerning attribute of teacher evaluations across countries is the systemic leniency of principals during classroom observations. However, little is known about the motivations behind this phenomenon. The purpose of this study is to explore the motivating factors behind principals' leniency in an authentic teacher evaluation system. In this study, we apply an explanatory-sequential mixed-method design. Using focus groups (qualitative strand; n = 15 principals) and a state-wide survey (quantitative strand; n = 364 principals), we apply goal theory to investigate influences on principals' ratings in a Midwestern state in the USA. Results suggest that multiple goals may drive principals during observations. These include the following: (1) providing accurate ratings and feedback to teachers; (2) keeping teachers open to growth-promoting feedback; (3) supporting teachers' morale and fostering positive relationships; (4) avoiding difficult conversations; (5) managing limited time wisely; and (6) maintaining self-efficacy as an instructional leader. Implications are that principals hold beneficial goals that may compete with accuracy when evaluating teachers, and that contextual differences in evaluation systems may influence the way principals act upon these goals. When responding to systemic leniency in teacher evaluations, solutions should increase accuracy in ways that minimally interfere with principals' other beneficial goals. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01