Well-Being and Equity: A Multi-Disciplinary Framework for Rethinking Education Policy

Autor/in	Germain, Emily
Titel	Well-Being and Equity: A Multi-Disciplinary Framework for Rethinking Education Policy
Quelle	In: Peabody Journal of Education, 97 (2022) 1, S.6-17 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0161-956X
DOI	10.1080/0161956X.2022.2026716
Schlagwörter	Well Being; Equal Education; Academic Achievement; Educational Policy; Economic Development; Decision Making; Neoliberalism; Educational History; Social Differences; Policy Analysis; Educational Change; Interdisciplinary Approach; Community Development + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Well-being; Wellness; Wohlbefinden; Schulleistung; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Wirtschaftsentwicklung; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Sozialer Unterschied; Politikfeldanalyse; Bildungsreform; Fächerübergreifender Unterricht; Fächerverbindender Unterricht; Interdisziplinarität; Community; Development; Entwicklung
Abstract	We are living in an era in which equity in education is framed and measured through individual academic achievement. Schools are viewed as economic engines for a better life . By virtue of providing adequate preparation for entering the economy and gaining a well-paying job, they are construed as capable of closing the opportunity gap. This misguided and ahistorical notion of equity fails to account for the nested nature of students, families, communities, and cities, and it disregards centuries of policy decisions that have shaped unequal conditions in communities and schools. While neoclassical economic theory has only more recently come to influence education, it has long driven national and international economic development. We know from research in the fields of human, community, and sustainable development that this economic approach does not attend to the spectrum of noneconomic needs that being met allow for individuals and communities to thrive. Nor does this approach address the roots of structural inequality. This paper draws from those fields to present a conceptual framework that can guide policymakers, researchers, and especially school, district, and state leaders to (re)consider the ways policy decisions challenge inequity. It does so by asking these stakeholders to center humanity through prioritizing intergenerational individual and community well-being. Further, the framework highlights the capacity of schools to serve as the driver of community uplift. Finally, this paper suggests that policy actors and practitioners participate in cross-sector collaboration to design policies that allow individuals, communities, and schools to flourish. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01