An Alternative Approach for Detecting Hearing Loss in Adults with Learning Disabilities

Autor/inn/en	McShea, Lynzee; Giles, Karen; Murphy, Ashley; Ling, Jonathan
Titel	An Alternative Approach for Detecting Hearing Loss in Adults with Learning Disabilities
Quelle	In: British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50 (2022) 1, S.66-75 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (McShea, Lynzee) ORCID (Giles, Karen) ORCID (Ling, Jonathan)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1354-4187
DOI	10.1111/bld.12377
Schlagwörter	Audiology; Auditory Evaluation; Hearing Impairments; Adults; Learning Disabilities; Screening Tests; Referral + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Audiologie; Hearing impairment; Hörbehinderung; Learning handicap; Lernbehinderung; Screening-Verfahren
Abstract	Background: Annual health checks in primary care include hearing assessment, though current guidance recommends subjective assessment only. Previous studies suggest this is inadequate and recommend objective alternatives such as hearing screening. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of hearing screening and examine the last recorded annual health check outcome for hearing, for those diagnosed with hearing loss as a result of the screening process. Method: Hearing screening took place in four locations and 75 people with learning disabilities participated. Contact was made with each individual's GP to share results and to request onward referral where indicated. Findings: Wax occlusion prevented screening for 23%. Fifty-seven people completed the screen, and 25 had suspected hearing loss. Of these, 22 people required referral to Audiology to verify their hearing thresholds. Only 13 were actually referred, and 11 individuals underwent assessment in Audiology, resulting in 10 being diagnosed with hearing loss. The most recent annual health check outcomes for hearing were examined for those diagnosed with hearing loss. Of the records we accessed, hearing loss had not been identified or actioned in every case. Conclusions: Hearing screening is shown here to be a suitable method for detecting hearing loss. We recommend changing current annual health check practice to incorporate objective screening. Only 12% of those with suspected hearing loss were known to Audiology services, suggesting a substantial proportion of undetected hearing loss in the community. We found evidence of apparent reluctance around referral and hearing aid fitting and make suggestions for improvement. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01