Maybe They're Born with It, or Maybe It's Experience: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Learning Style Myth

Autor/inn/en	Nancekivell, Shaylene E.; Shah, Priti; Gelman, Susan A.
Titel	Maybe They're Born with It, or Maybe It's Experience: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Learning Style Myth
Quelle	In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 112 (2020) 2, S.221-235 (15 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0663
DOI	10.1037/edu0000366
Schlagwörter	Cognitive Style; Misconceptions; Psychology; Predictor Variables; Teacher Attitudes; Brain; Age Differences; Genetics; Environmental Influences; Adults; Individual Differences; Educational Attainment; Occupations; School Personnel; Trainers; Instructional Program Divisions; Teaching Experience + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Cognitive styles; Kognitiver Stil; Missverständnis; Psychologie; Prädiktor; Lehrerverhalten; Gehirn; Age; Difference; Age difference; Altersunterschied; Humangenetik; Environmental influence; Umwelteinfluss; Individueller Unterschied; Bildungsabschluss; Bildungsgut; Beruf; Berufsumfeld; Schulpersonal; Ausbildungslehrer; Trainer
Abstract	Decades of research suggest that learning styles, or the belief that people learn better when they receive instruction in their dominant way of learning, may be one of the most pervasive myths about cognition. Nonetheless, little is known about what it means to believe in learning styles. The present investigation uses one theoretical framework--psychological essentialism--to explore the content and consistency of people's learning style beliefs. Psychological essentialism is a belief that certain categories (such as dogs, girls, or visual learners) have an underlying reality or true nature that is biologically based and highly predictive of many other features (Gelman, 2003). We tested the prevalence of erroneous essentialist beliefs regarding learning styles in both educators and noneducators, including that learning styles are innate, unchanging, discrete, and wired into the brain. In each of two experiments, we identified two groups of learning style believers, with one group holding an essentialist interpretation of learning styles, and the other group holding a nonessentialist interpretation of learning styles. No differences were found between educators' and noneducators' beliefs. In fact, only one factor was found to be a significant predictor of learning style beliefs for educators: the age of the population with whom they work. Specifically, those who worked with younger children were more likely to interpret learning styles in an essentialist way. Together the findings demonstrate that learning style beliefs are far more complex and variable than previously recognized. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01