Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Haladyna, Thomas M.; Rodriguez, Michael C.; Stevens, Craig |
|---|---|
| Titel | Are Multiple-Choice Items Too Fat? |
| Quelle | In: Applied Measurement in Education, 32 (2019) 4, S.350-364 (15 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0895-7347 |
| DOI | 10.1080/08957347.2019.1660348 |
| Schlagwörter | Multiple Choice Tests; Test Items; Testing Problems; Guessing (Tests); Evaluation Criteria; Achievement Tests; College Entrance Examinations; Licensing Examinations (Professions) |
| Abstract | The evidence is mounting regarding the guidance to employ more three-option multiple-choice items. From theoretical analyses, empirical results, and practical considerations, such items are of equal or higher quality than four- or five-option items, and more items can be administered to improve content coverage. This study looks at 58 tests, including state achievement, college readiness, and credentialing tests. The evidence here supports previous assertions. The article also clarifies distractor functioning criteria and offers a typology of items via distractor functioning. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2020/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
