The Cost of Multiple Representations: Learning Number Symbols with Abstract and Concrete Representations

Autor/inn/en	Bennett, Amy; Inglis, Matthew; Gilmore, Camilla
Titel	The Cost of Multiple Representations: Learning Number Symbols with Abstract and Concrete Representations
Quelle	In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 111 (2019) 5, S.847-860 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Inglis, Matthew)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0663
DOI	10.1037/edu0000318
Schlagwörter	Numbers; Symbols (Mathematics); Mathematical Concepts; Learning Strategies; Instructional Effectiveness; Books; Children; Foreign Countries; Artificial Intelligence; Elementary School Students; Mathematics Instruction; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Zahlenraum; Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; Unterrichtserfolg; Book; Buch; Monographie; Monografie; Child; Kind; Kinder; Ausland; Künstliche Intelligenz; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht
Abstract	Parents are frequently advised to use number books to help their children learn the meaning of number words and symbols. How should these resources be designed to best support learning? Previous research has shown that number books typically include multiple concrete representations of number. However, a large body of mathematics education research has demonstrated that there may be costs, as well as benefits, to using both multiple representations and concrete representations when learning mathematical concepts. Here we used an artificial symbol learning paradigm to explore whether the use of abstract (arrays of dots) or multiple concrete (changing arrays of pictures) numerical representations resulted in better learning of novel numerical symbols by children. Across 3 experiments, we found that children who learned the meaning of novel symbols by pairing them with numerosities represented by arrays of dots performed better on a subsequent symbolic comparison task than those who paired them with multiple concrete representations, or a mixture of abstract and multiple concrete representations. This advantage was not due to abstract representations being inherently superior to concrete representations, but instead to the use of multiple concrete representations. We conclude that the very common practice of using multiple concrete representations in children's number books may not be the most effective to support children's early number learning. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01