Co-Occurrence of Academic and Behavioral Risk within Elementary Schools: Implications for Universal Screening Practices

Autor/inn/en	Kilgus, Stephen P.; Izumi, Jared T.; Von der Embse, Nathaniel P.; Van Wie, Michael P.; Eklund, Katie; Taylor, Crystal N.; Iaccarino, Stephanie
Titel	Co-Occurrence of Academic and Behavioral Risk within Elementary Schools: Implications for Universal Screening Practices
Quelle	In: School Psychology, 34 (2019) 3, S.261-270 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2578-4218
DOI	10.1037/spq0000314
Schlagwörter	Elementary School Students; Grade 3; Grade 4; Grade 5; At Risk Students; Academic Achievement; Student Behavior; Mathematics Achievement; Suspension; Screening Tests; Attendance; Reading Achievement + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; School year 05; 5. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 05; Schulleistung; Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; Mathmatics sikills; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematical ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Ausschluss; Schulausschluss; Screening-Verfahren; Anwesenheit; Leseleistung
Abstract	The purposes of this study were twofold. The first was to use latent class analysis to identify groupings of students defined by the presence or absence of academic or behavioral risk. The second was to determine whether these groups differed across various dichotomous academic and behavioral outcomes (e.g., suspensions, office discipline referrals, statewide achievement test failure). Students (N = 1,488) were sampled from Grades 3-5. All students were screened for academic risk using AIMSweb Reading Curriculum-Based Measure and AIMSweb Mathematics Computation, and behavioral risk using the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS). Latent class analyses supported the fit of a three-class model, with resulting student classes defined as low-risk academic and behavior (Class 1), at-risk academic and high-risk behavior (Class 2), and at-risk math and behavior (Class 3). Logistic regression analyses indicated the classes demonstrated statistically significant differences statewide achievement scores, as well as suspensions. Further analysis indicated that the odds of all considered negative outcomes were higher for both groups characterized by risk (i.e., Classes 2 and 3). Negative outcomes were particularly likely for Class 2, with the odds of negative behavioral and academic outcomes being 6-15 and 112-169 times more likely, respectively. Results were taken to support an integrated approach to universal screening in schools, defined by the evaluation of both academic and behavioral risk. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01