Shaming School Children: A Violation of Fundamental Rights?

Autor/inn/en	Goodman, Joan F.; Cook, Britiny Iris
Titel	Shaming School Children: A Violation of Fundamental Rights?
Quelle	In: Theory and Research in Education, 17 (2019) 1, S.62-81 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1477-8785
DOI	10.1177/1477878518817377
Schlagwörter	Childrens Rights; Freedom; Punishment; Anxiety; Charter Schools; Discipline Policy; Human Dignity; Child Welfare + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? 'Children''s rights'; Kindesrecht; Freiheit; Bestrafung; Angst; Charter school; Charter-Schule; Disziplinarmaßnahme; Menschenwürde; Kindeswohl
Abstract	Children in schools are often shamed, at times intentionally, sometimes inadvertently. The question we pose is whether this practice violates their fundamental human rights, in particular that of freedom. Arguably, because of their limited capacities and dependent status what children require is protection rather than rights. Yet, children are not just a collection of needs requiring care; they are also apprentices to adulthood holding 'rights-in-trust'. We confront the conflict through the following: (1) clarify the slippery term shame and its corollaries humiliation, embarrassment, and guilt; (2) illustrate school shaming practices with a focus on No Excuses charter management organizations; (3) review empirical and theoretical appraisals of shaming; (4) suggest that the concept of human dignity, upon which human rights rest, creates a moral barrier limiting the permissibility of shaming; (5) it follows schools should foster children's dual rights, welfare, and freedom/autonomy, with a consciousness of freedom as the eventual and pre-eminent goal; (6) in conclusion, shame -- a disparagement of the other by a person in authority that is both intended and received as such -- is almost never justified as a disciplinary technique. It shrinks the self and immobilizes action. Discipline through guilt inducement is far preferable because its target is an act, not the person, and it motivates reparation. Schools are therefore obliged to abolish shaming practices, in so far as they can, and search for disciplinary alternatives; we offer an approach. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01