Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Han, Xiao |
---|---|
Titel | Cross-Field Effect and Institutional Habitus Formation: Self-Reinforcing Inequality in Chinese Higher Education System |
Quelle | In: Journal of Education Policy, 34 (2019) 2, S.267-294 (28 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Han, Xiao) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0268-0939 |
DOI | 10.1080/02680939.2018.1456676 |
Schlagwörter | Higher Education; Educational Policy; Politics of Education; International Education; Political Influences; Equal Education; Foreign Countries; Policy Analysis; Social Capital; Educational Resources; International Cooperation; Educational Cooperation; Local Government; Educational Finance; Neoliberalism; Administrative Organization; Rewards; Decision Making; Power Structure; China Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Educational policy; Internationale Erziehung; Political influence; Politischer Einfluss; Ausland; Politikfeldanalyse; Sozialkapital; Bildungsmittel; Internationale Kooperation; Internationale Zusammenarbeit; Education; cooperation; Kooperation; Gemeindeverwaltung; Bildungsfonds; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; Reward; Belohnung; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung |
Abstract | Bourdieu's concept of field offers an alternative explanation for the inevitable gap between policy initiative and implementation. While the existing literature mostly concentrated on the dichotomy of macro- and micro-politics in enacting education policies, the missing attention to meso-level, local governments as policy interpreters and implementers in some developing countries with a vast territory, China and Russia, for example, has hindered deeper exploration in policy studies. Adopting cross-field effects as the theoretical base and applying Bourdieu's conceptual triad as a whole, rather than considering habitus, practice, or field separately, this study examines Chinese transnational higher education (TNHE) policy enactment by subnational authorities, aiming to: first, contextualize Bourdieu's theoretical and empirical approaches in various political/economic systems while consider the policy practice at meso-level; second, demonstrate the essentiality of conversation rate and standard of capitals in field analysis; and third, based on these analyses, explore the formation of institutional habitus as a way of explaining the perennial inequality in the Chinese higher education (HE) system. The paper concludes with a theoretical reflection that Bourdieu's ever-developing definition of habitus and the criticism of his unavoidable relapse to objectivism result from the indiscriminate use of individual and institutional habitus. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |