Examining How Professional Roles and Test Development Experiences Impact Angoff Ratings

Autor/in	Wyse, Adam E.
Titel	Examining How Professional Roles and Test Development Experiences Impact Angoff Ratings
Quelle	In: Applied Measurement in Education, 31 (2018) 4, S.324-334 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0895-7347
DOI	10.1080/08957347.2018.1495214
Schlagwörter	Standard Setting (Scoring); Test Construction; Cutting Scores; Accuracy; Professional Personnel; Licensing Examinations (Professions) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bewertungsskala; Testaufbau; Personalbestand
Abstract	An important consideration in standard setting is recruiting a group of panelists with different experiences and backgrounds to serve on the standard-setting panel. This study uses data from 14 different Angoff standard settings from a variety of medical imaging credentialing programs to examine whether people with different professional roles and test development experiences tended to recommend higher or lower cut scores or were more or less accurate in their standard-setting judgments. Results suggested that there were not any statistically significant differences for different types of panelists in terms of the cut scores they recommended or the accuracy of their judgments. Discussion of what these results may mean for panelist selection and recruitment is provided. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01