Researcher Intersubjectivity: A Methodology for Jointly Building an Interactive Electronic Early Childhood Quality Involvement/Rating Scale

Autor/inn/en	Fleer, Marilyn; Hedges, Helen; Fleer-Stout, Freya; Bich Hanh, Le Thi
Titel	Researcher Intersubjectivity: A Methodology for Jointly Building an Interactive Electronic Early Childhood Quality Involvement/Rating Scale
Quelle	In: International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41 (2018) 1, S.69-88 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1743-727X
DOI	10.1080/1743727X.2016.1219982
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Early Childhood Education; Rating Scales; Educational Quality; Culturally Relevant Education; Child Development; Cultural Context; History; Methods; Knowledge Level; Cultural Differences; Social Theories; Preschool Children; Grade 1; Workshops; Vietnam; Australia; New Zealand; Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Early childhood; Education; Frühkindliche Bildung; Frühpädagogik; Rating-Skala; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Kindesentwicklung; Geschichte; Geschichtsdarstellung; Method; Methode; Wissensbasis; Kultureller Unterschied; Gesellschaftstheorie; Pre-school age; Preschool age; Child; Children; Pre-school education; Preschool education; Vorschulalter; Kind; Kinder; Vorschulkind; Vorschulkinder; Vorschulerziehung; Vorschule; School year 01; 1. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 01; Lernwerkstatt; Schulung; Australien; Neuseeland
Abstract	Researching quality in early childhood settings has been operationalized in many ways, within and across countries. Nevertheless, despite some consensus on what might constitute a universally recognized view of what is considered essential for young children's development, there are strong indicators that locally developed assessment tools are likely to give more contextually relevant results. Yet, little appears to be known about how to develop localized tools for assessing quality, especially in culturally diverse research contexts. Further, it would seem that not much is understood about the ways researchers and research participants have worked together to achieve reciprocal outcomes. In drawing upon cultural-historical theory, this paper goes beyond the traditional binary of an emic-etic perspective and instead describes a dialectical model for creating conditions for generating "research intersubjectivity." An example of how researchers and participants worked together to develop an interactive e-quality rating scale in Vietnam is presented with the research exchange methods of "Dialogue through the technology," "Capturing moments of localized quality," "Community walk," and "Research selfies." These methods together acted to underpin the methodology that foregrounds what we have termed "research intersubjectivity." (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01