New Data, Old Tensions: Big Data, Personalized Learning, and the Challenges of Progressive Education

Autor/in	Dishon, Gideon
Titel	New Data, Old Tensions: Big Data, Personalized Learning, and the Challenges of Progressive Education
Quelle	In: Theory and Research in Education, 15 (2017) 3, S.272-289 (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1477-8785
DOI	10.1177/1477878517735233
Schlagwörter	Data Collection; Data Analysis; Information Utilization; Individualized Instruction; Progressive Education; Expectation; Educational Theories; Personal Autonomy; Decision Making; Learning Processes; Technology Uses in Education; Freedom; Role of Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Data capture; Datensammlung; Auswertung; Informationsnutzung; Individualisierender Unterricht; Reformpädagogik; Progressive Erziehung; Expectancy; Erwartung; Educational theory; Theory of education; Bildungstheorie; Individuelle Autonomie; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Learning process; Lernprozess; Technology enhanced learning; Technology aided learning; Technologieunterstütztes Lernen; Freiheit; Bildungsauftrag
Abstract	Personalized learning has become the most notable application of big data in primary and secondary schools in the United States. The combination of big data and adaptive technological platforms is heralded as a revolution that could transform education, overcoming the outdated classroom model, and realizing the progressive vision of interest-driven and self-initiated learning. Yet, even supporters concede that, in practice, personalized learning is geared toward behaviorist models of learning. This article explores how this gap between expectation and reality concerning big data can be understood as a reflection of existing tensions within progressive education. To explain the tension, I examine the interplay between Rousseau and Dewey's theories of education, and the novel opportunities offered by big data. I hold that personalized learning could be understood as an iteration of Rousseau's vision of well-regulated freedom, in which students' freedom is perceived as a means toward increasing the effectiveness of their learning. The relegation of decision making to algorithms renders this regulation more feasible and justifiable. Dewey's critique of Rousseau's individualized and teleological model of education offers the contours of an alternative role for big data in education, which prioritizes social interaction and the cultivation of democratic citizens. Moreover, due to the increased capacity to operationalize complex learning processes in naturalistic learning environments, big data could allow tackling some of the lingering challenges to implementing Dewey's approach. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01