Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Zirkel, Perry A. |
|---|---|
| Titel | A Major New Court Decision: Are Blurred Boundaries Worth the Price on the Eligibility Side? |
| Quelle | In: Exceptionality, 25 (2017) 1, S.1-8 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0936-2835 |
| DOI | 10.1080/09362835.2016.1251187 |
| Schlagwörter | Disabilities; Educational Legislation; Equal Education; Federal Legislation; Court Litigation; Eligibility; Special Education; Individualized Education Programs; Regular and Special Education Relationship; Response to Intervention; California |
| Abstract | Legally, the ultimate criterion for eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is whether the child needs special education. A new decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals suggests that providing various interventions and accommodations in general education might mean that a child who meets the criteria for any IDEA classification and receives such services is eligible for an individualized education program. The scope of this new decision and the relationship between special and general education are subject to several questions. However, using various individualized approaches in general education, including response to intervention, may be worth the limited risk of a judicially reversed eligibility determination. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2020/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
