Comparison of Multidimensional Item Response Models: Multivariate Normal Ability Distributions versus Multivariate Polytomous Ability Distributions. Research Report. ETS RR-08-45

Autor/inn/en	Haberman, Shelby J.; von Davier, Matthias; Lee, Yi-Hsuan
Titel	Comparison of Multidimensional Item Response Models: Multivariate Normal Ability Distributions versus Multivariate Polytomous Ability Distributions. Research Report. ETS RR-08-45
Quelle	In: ETS Research Report Series, (2008), (30 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2330-8516
Schlagwörter	Item Response Theory; Comparative Analysis; Ability; Models; Goodness of Fit; Multivariate Analysis; Mathematics + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Item-Response-Theorie; Fähigkeit; Fertigkeit; Analogiemodell; Multivariate Analyse; Mathematik
Abstract	Multidimensional item response models can be based on multivariate normal ability distributions or on multivariate polytomous ability distributions. For the case of simple structure in which each item corresponds to a unique dimension of the ability vector, some applications of the two-parameter logistic model to empirical data are employed to illustrate how, at least for the example under study, comparable results can be achieved with either approach. Comparability involves quality of model fit as well as similarity in terms of parameter estimates and computational time required. In both cases, numerical work can be performed quite efficiently. In the case of the multivariate normal ability distribution, multivariate adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature can be employed to greatly reduce computational labor. In the case of a polytomous ability distribution, use of log-linear models permits efficient computations. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Educational Testing Service. Rosedale Road, MS19-R Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/ets
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01