Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Löfström, Erika; Pyhältö, Kirsi |
---|---|
Titel | "I Don't Even Have Time to Be Their Friend!" Ethical Dilemmas in Ph.D. Supervision in the Hard Sciences |
Quelle | In: International Journal of Science Education, 37 (2015) 16, S.2721-2739 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0950-0693 |
DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2015.1104424 |
Schlagwörter | Supervision; Doctoral Dissertations; Ethics; Natural Sciences; Graduate Students; College Faculty; Content Analysis; Expectation; Supervisors; Teacher Role; Professional Autonomy; Justice; Case Studies; Research Universities; Foreign Countries; Communities of Practice; Scholarship; Supervisor Supervisee Relationship; Semi Structured Interviews; Finland Doctoral dissertation; Doctoral thesis; Doctoral theses; Dissertationsschrift; Ethik; Naturwissenschaften; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Fakultät; Inhaltsanalyse; Expectancy; Erwartung; Lehrerrolle; Berufsfreiheit; Gerechtigkeit; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Forschungseinrichtung; Ausland; Community; Scholarships; Stipendium; Finnland |
Abstract | This study focused on exploring students' and supervisors' perceptions of ethical problems in doctoral supervision in the natural sciences. Fifteen supervisors and doctoral students in one research community in the natural sciences were interviewed about their practices and experiences in the doctoral process and supervision. We explored to what extent doctoral students and supervisors experienced similar or different ethical challenges in the supervisory relationship and analyzed how the experiences of ethical dilemmas in supervision could be understood in light of the structure and practices of natural science research groups. The data were analyzed by theory-driven content analysis. Five ethical principles, namely non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, fidelity and justice, were used as a framework for identifying ethical issues. The results show that one major question that appears to underpin many of the emerging ethical issues is that the supervisors and students have different expectations of the supervisory role. The second important observation is that doctoral students primarily described their own experiences, whereas the supervisors described their activities as embedded in a system and elaborated on the causes and consequences at a system level. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |