Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Jeong, Heejeong |
---|---|
Titel | What Is Your Teacher Rubric? Extracting Teachers' Assessment Constructs |
Quelle | In: Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20 (2015) 6, (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1531-7714 |
Schlagwörter | Scoring Rubrics; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Evaluation Criteria; Writing Evaluation; Descriptive Writing; English Teachers; College Faculty; Teacher Made Tests |
Abstract | Rubrics not only document the scales and criteria of what is assessed, but can also represent the assessment construct of the developer. Rubrics display the key assessment criteria, and the simplicity or complexity of the rubric can illustrate the meaning associated with the score. For this study, five experienced teachers developed a rubric for an EFL (English as a Foreign Language) descriptive writing task. Results show that even for the same task, teachers developed different formats and styles of rubric with both similar and different criteria. The teacher rubrics were analyzed for assessment criteria, rubric type and scale type. Findings illustrate that in terms of criteria, all teacher rubrics had five areas in common: comprehension, paragraph structure, sentence structure, vocabulary, and grammar. The criteria that varied were mechanics, length, task completion, and self-correction. Rubric style and scales also were different among teachers. Teachers who valued global concerns (i.e., comprehension) in writing designed more general holistic rubrics, while teachers who focused more on sentence-level concerns (i.e., grammar) developed analytic rubrics with more details. The assessment construct of the teacher was shown in the rubric through assessment criteria, rubric style, and scale. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Dr. Lawrence M. Rudner. e-mail: editor@pareonline.net; Web site: http://pareonline.net |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |