Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Denton, Carolyn A.; Tolar, Tammy D.; Fletcher, Jack M.; Barth, Amy E.; Vaughn, Sharon; Francis, David J. |
---|---|
Titel | Effects of Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties and Characteristics of Inadequate Responders |
Quelle | In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (2013) 3, S.633-648 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0022-0663 |
DOI | 10.1037/a0032581 |
Schlagwörter | Reading Difficulties; Intervention; Student Characteristics; Grade 2; Individualized Instruction; Reading Instruction; Achievement Gains; Experimental Groups; Control Groups; Word Recognition; Phonemics; Reading Fluency; Reading Comprehension; Effect Size; Cognitive Ability; Response to Intervention; Outcome Measures; Predictor Variables; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Instructional Effectiveness; Pretests Posttests; Multivariate Analysis; Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS); Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests; Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test; Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement Reading difficulty; Leseschwierigkeit; School year 02; 2. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 02; Individualisierender Unterricht; Leseunterricht; Achievement gain; Leistungssteigerung; Worterkennung; Fonemsystem; Leseverstehen; Denkfähigkeit; Prädiktor; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Unterrichtserfolg; Multivariate Analyse |
Abstract | This article describes a randomized controlled trial conducted to evaluate the effects of an intensive, individualized, Tier 3 reading intervention for second grade students who had previously experienced inadequate response to quality first grade classroom reading instruction (Tier 1) and supplemental small-group intervention (Tier 2). Also evaluated were cognitive characteristics of students with inadequate response to intensive Tier 3 intervention. Students were randomized to receive the research intervention (N = 47) or the instruction and intervention typically provided in their schools (N = 25). Results indicated that students who received the research intervention made significantly better growth than those who received typical school instruction on measures of word identification, phonemic decoding, and word reading fluency and on a measure of sentence- and paragraph-level reading comprehension. Treatment effects were smaller and not statistically significant on phonemic decoding efficiency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension in extended text. Effect sizes for all outcomes except oral reading fluency met criteria for substantive importance; however, many of the students in the intervention continued to struggle. An evaluation of cognitive profiles of adequate and inadequate responders was consistent with a continuum of severity (as opposed to qualitative differences), showing greater language and reading impairment prior to the intervention in students who were inadequate responders. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |