Red Dirt Thinking on Power, Pedagogy and Paradigms: Reframing the Dialogue in Remote Education

Autor/inn/en	Osborne, Sam; Guenther, John
Titel	Red Dirt Thinking on Power, Pedagogy and Paradigms: Reframing the Dialogue in Remote Education
Quelle	In: Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 42 (2013) 2, S.111-122 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1326-0111
DOI	10.1017/jie.2013.19
Schlagwörter	Power Structure; Teaching Methods; Rural Education; Foreign Countries; Indigenous Populations; Equal Education; Research Methodology; Educational Policy; Indigenous Knowledge; Academic Achievement; Pacific Islanders; Cultural Awareness; Culturally Relevant Education; Australia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Ländliche Erwachsenenbildung; Ausland; Sinti und Roma; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Schulleistung; Pacific Rim; Inhabitant; People; Pazifischer Raum; Bewohner; Cultural identity; Kulturelle Identität; Australien
Abstract	Recent debates in Australia, largely led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island academics over the past 5 or so years, have focused on the need for non-Indigenous educators to understand how their practices not only demonstrate lack of understanding of Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing, but even deny their presence. This debate has serious implications for the non-Indigenous remote educator who wishes to support remote students to achieve "success" through their education. The debates on the one hand advocate the decolonising of knowledge, pedagogy and research methods in order to promote more just or equal approaches to research and education, while other voices continue to advocate the pursuit of mainstream dominant Western "outcomes" as the preferred goal for Indigenous students across Australia. This dilemma frames the context for this study. The Remote Education Systems Project, in the Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation, seeks to explore these and other questions as part of the broader research agenda being undertaken. This project is particularly focused on large-scale questions such as: 'What is a remote education for and what would 'success' look like in the remote education context?" We are approaching these research questions from community standpoints and perspectives as a critical starting point for these types of debates and discussions. In doing so, our findings indicate that remote Aboriginal community members have a strong sense of western education and its power to equip young people with critical skills, knowledge and understandings for the future, but also a strong sense of retaining of their "own" knowledge, skills and understanding. This presents a complex challenge for educators who are new to this knowledge interface. Here, we offer the concept of "Red Dirt Thinking" as a new way to position ourselves and engage in situated dialogue about what remote schooling might be if it took into account power issues around Indigenous knowledges in the current policy context. This article questions whether remote communities, schools and systems have, in fact, taken account of the knowledge/power debates that have taken place at an academic level and considers how remote education might consider the implications of stepping outside the "Western-Indigenous binary". It seeks to propose new paradigms that non-Indigenous educators may need to engage in order to de-limit the repositioning of power-laden knowledge and pedagogies offered in remote classrooms. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: http://journals.cambridge.org/JIE
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10