Elementary Teachers' Curriculum Design and Pedagogical Reasoning for Supporting Students' Comparison and Evaluation of Evidence-Based Explanations

Autor/inn/en	Biggers, Mandy; Forbes, Cory T.; Zangori, Laura
Titel	Elementary Teachers' Curriculum Design and Pedagogical Reasoning for Supporting Students' Comparison and Evaluation of Evidence-Based Explanations
Quelle	In: Elementary School Journal, 114 (2013) 1, S.48-72 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0013-5984
DOI	10.1086/670738
Schlagwörter	Elementary School Teachers; Elementary School Science; Science Instruction; Inquiry; Active Learning; Curriculum Design; Mixed Methods Research; Case Studies; Lesson Plans; Instructional Design; Logical Thinking; Comparative Analysis; Evaluation; Elementary School Students; Grade 1; Grade 3; Grade 4; Evidence; Urban Schools + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Aktives Lernen; Lehrplangestaltung; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Lesson planning; Unterrichtsplanung; Lesson concept; Lessonplan; Unterrichtsentwurf; Evaluierung; School year 01; 1. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 01; School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; Evidenz; Urban area; Urban areas; School; Schools; Stadtregion; Stadt; Schule
Abstract	Previous research suggests that elementary teachers vary in their enactment of science curriculum materials and may not always engage students in substantive sense making. This mixed-methods study investigates elementary teachers' use of science curriculum materials to engage students in the scientific practice of comparing and evaluating evidence-based explanations. We asked (1) How do in-service elementary teachers use existing science curriculum materials to engage students in comparing and evaluating evidence-based explanations? and (2) What do their instructional design practices reveal about their pedagogical reasoning for engaging students in comparing and evaluating evidence-based explanations? Our results suggest that comparing and evaluating explanations was the least-emphasized feature of inquiry in these teachers' planned and enacted science instruction. Though the teachers made small adjustments that better engaged students in the practice, their curriculum materials and ideas about comparing and evaluating evidence-based explanations limited the impact of their curriculum design decisions on students' sense-making opportunities. (Contains 3 notes, 3 figures, and 4 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	University of Chicago Press. Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel: 877-705-1878; Tel: 773-753-3347; Fax: 877-705-1879; Fax: 773-753-0811; e-mail: subscriptions@press.uchicago.edu; Web site: http://www.press.uchicago.edu
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10