A Comparison of Responsive Interventions on Kindergarteners' Early Reading Achievement

Autor/inn/en	Little, Mary E.; Rawlinson, D'Ann; Simmons, Deborah C.; Kim, Minjung; Kwok, Oi-man; Hagan-Burke, Shanna; Simmons, Leslie E.; Fogarty, Melissa; Oslund, Eric; Coyne, Michael D.
Titel	A Comparison of Responsive Interventions on Kindergarteners' Early Reading Achievement
Quelle	In: Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27 (2012) 4, S.189-202 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0938-8982
DOI	10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00366.x
Schlagwörter	Reading Achievement; Outcome Measures; Kindergarten; Response to Intervention; Reading Difficulties; Early Reading; Effect Size; Comparative Analysis; Academic Achievement; Reading Instruction; Pretests Posttests; Professional Development; Literacy; Reliability; Florida; Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS); Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; Woodcock Reading Mastery Test + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Leseleistung; Reading difficulty; Leseschwierigkeit; Frühlesen; Schulleistung; Leseunterricht; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Reliabilität
Abstract	This study compared the effects of Tier 2 reading interventions that operated in response-to-intervention contexts. Kindergarten children (N = 90) who were identified as at risk for reading difficulties were stratified by school and randomly assigned to receive (a) Early Reading Intervention (ERI; Pearson/Scott Foresman, 2004) modified in response to student performance or (b) their schools' typical supplemental reading intervention (regrouping and curriculum pacing adjustments). In both conditions, intervention was provided 30 minutes per day in small groups for approximately 100 sessions. Results indicated no statistically significant group differences on any outcome measures. Between-group effect sizes revealed substantively important differences (Valentine & Cooper, 2003) favoring the ERI responsive condition on multiple measures with effect sizes ranging from 0.35 to 0.59. Overall, findings indicated that the majority of students in both Tier 2 intervention conditions performed above the 30th percentile on posttest measures of word reading measures. (Contains 1 figure and 5 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10