Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Shaw, Steven R.; Pecsi, Sierra |
---|---|
Titel | When Is the Evidence Sufficiently Supportive of Real-World Application? Evidence-Based Practices, Open Science, Clinical Readiness Level |
Quelle | In: Psychology in the Schools, 58 (2021) 10, S.1891-1901 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Shaw, Steven R.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0033-3085 |
DOI | 10.1002/pits.22537 |
Schlagwörter | Evidence Based Practice; Intervention; School Psychology; COVID-19; Pandemics; Readiness; Scoring Rubrics; Theory Practice Relationship |
Abstract | Evidence-based interventions are the standard for school psychology practice. Yet, how do professionals know when research scope, relevance, transparency, and quality are ready for real-world application? There remain questions as to exactly how these core concepts of evidence-based practices (EBPs) are realized. A discussion on whether psychological science can be relied on to deliver real-world practices related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led IJzerman and colleagues to develop a rubric to evaluate research for real-world application called evidence readiness level. This model is adapted for school psychologists' use in evaluating and implementing research for clinical practice. Clinical readiness level is a rubric that is designed to narrow the research-to-practice gap, provide criteria for EBPs, and specify the value of a scientist-practitioner model of school psychology. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |