Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Matos, Flora |
---|---|
Titel | Collaborative Writing as a Bridge from Peer Discourse to Individual Argumentative Writing |
Quelle | In: Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34 (2021) 5, S.1321-1342 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Matos, Flora) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0922-4777 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11145-020-10117-2 |
Schlagwörter | Collaborative Writing; Peer Relationship; Persuasive Discourse; Dialogs (Language); Intervention; Grade 6; Writing Achievement; Essays |
Abstract | Converging evidence indicates that argumentative thinking and writing are promoted by peer discourse. Here it is proposed that collaborative writing can serve as a bridge from peer discourse to individual argumentative writing. Three groups of sixth graders participated in a study that tested this hypothesis. Two of the groups took part in a month-long intervention that emphasized engagement and practice in dialogic argumentation. These two groups differed only in addition of a joint writing activity in one group. The third group served as a non-intervention control. Final individual essays showed superior performance by the joint writing group. Essays of the superior group more frequently included evidence-based arguments. They also more often integrated belief-incongruent statements with belief-congruent ones. Group differences transferred in several respects to essays on a new topic. Results support the claim that engagement in collaborative writing offers a promising path in developing argumentative writing. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |