Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Bennedsen, J.; Rouvrais, S.; Roslöf, J.; Kontio, J.; Georgsson, F.; McCartan, C. D. |
---|---|
Titel | Collaborative Quality Enhancement in Engineering Education: An Overview of Operational Models at a Programme Level |
Quelle | In: European Journal of Engineering Education, 45 (2020) 1, S.73-88 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Bennedsen, J.) ORCID (McCartan, C. D.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0304-3797 |
DOI | 10.1080/03043797.2018.1443058 |
Schlagwörter | Engineering Education; Educational Quality; Quality Assurance; Accreditation (Institutions); Educational Change; Educational Innovation; Standards; Teaching Methods; Cooperation; Curriculum Development; Accountability; Competition; Program Improvement; Models; Comparative Analysis; School Holding Power; Networks; Best Practices; Self Evaluation (Groups); Institutional Evaluation; Higher Education; Workshops; Partnerships in Education; Foreign Countries; Europe Ingenieurausbildung; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Qualitätssicherung; Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Bildungsreform; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; Standard; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Co-operation; Kooperation; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Verantwortung; Wettkampf; Analogiemodell; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz); Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Lernwerkstatt; Schulung; Hochschulpartnerschaft; Ausland; Europa |
Abstract | This article discusses the tension between quality assurance and quality enhancement in engineering education at a programme level. It acknowledges that accreditation has evolved for many years, but does not agilely support innovation or implement changes in educational programmes. Existing quality assurance systems, institutional collaboration networks, as well as new innovative quality enhancement models and processes are described, contrasted and synthesised. Quality enhancement is analysed based on its function as a source of inspiration and dissemination of good practice. The article reflects on a novel and more collaborative approach to quality enhancement, built on the foundations of specific pedagogical standards and rubrics (e.g. CDIO). One solution leading to real continuous quality enhancement could be flexible and agile evaluation processes. These are founded on measurement and rating frameworks and complemented with quality assurance for engineering education. Incremental enhancement is based on relevant needs identified collaboratively between programmes. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |