Learning Communities and Unlinked Sections: A Contrast of Student Backgrounds, Student Outcomes, and In-Class Experiences

Autor/inn/en	Holt, Emily A.; Nielson, Amanda
Titel	Learning Communities and Unlinked Sections: A Contrast of Student Backgrounds, Student Outcomes, and In-Class Experiences
Quelle	In: Research in Higher Education, 60 (2019) 5, S.670-683 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0361-0365
DOI	10.1007/s11162-018-9531-1
Schlagwörter	Communities of Practice; Cooperative Learning; Academic Achievement; Academic Persistence; Background; Student Characteristics; Learner Engagement; Peer Relationship; Teacher Student Relationship; Interaction + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Community; Kooperatives Lernen; Schulleistung; Hintergrundinformation; Peer-Beziehungen; Teacher student relationships; Lehrer-Schüler-Beziehung; Interaktion
Abstract	Learning communities, the co-registration of student cohorts sharing curricular goals, are often associated with greater academic achievement, retention, inclusivity, and engagement. While not all previous studies unequivocally demonstrate a positive learning community effect on performance, many suggest that students participating in learning communities identify a greater sense of community and interaction with their peers and instructors. Few studies, however, have compiled both academic metrics of success as well as multiple quantitative measures of academic engagement. Moreover, few studies have contrasted these metrics to roughly equivalent classes where the only difference was linkage by a learning community, while holding course content, semester, and instructor constant. Our research goal was to compare academic performance, retention, student background, and engagement of students participating in learning communities to those in similar but unlinked sections. We found no significant differences in academic performance, student background, or engagement between linked learning community classes and unlinked, freestanding sections of the same class. We also found student retention was lower in learning community sections compared to unlinked sections. Some of our findings may reflect our student population of a non-residential, commuter campus where building relationships may be more difficult. We suggest that other metrics of success, including those that quantify interdisciplinary knowledge or skills and collaboration, may better reflect gains of success in learning community environments. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01