Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Priestley, Mark |
|---|---|
| Titel | Whatever Happened to Curriculum Theory? Critical Realism and Curriculum Change |
| Quelle | In: Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19 (2011) 2, S.221-237 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1468-1366 |
| Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Curriculum Development; Realism; Curriculum Research; Social Theories; National Curriculum; Educational Policy; Foreign Countries; Social Influences; Cultural Influences; Educational Change; New Zealand; United Kingdom; United Kingdom (Scotland) |
| Abstract | In the face of what has been characterised by some as a "crisis" in curriculum--an apparent decline of some aspects of curriculum studies combined with the emergence of new types of national curricula which downgrade knowledge--some writers have been arguing for the use of realist theory to address these issues. This article offers a contribution to this debate, drawing upon critical realism, and especially upon the social theory of Margaret Archer. The article first outlines the supposed crisis in curriculum, before providing an overview of some of the key tenets of critical realism. It concludes by speculating on how critical realism may offer new ways of thinking to inform policy and practice in a key curricular problematic. This is the issue of curriculum change. (Contains 1 figure and 1 note.) (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
