Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Hiebert, Elfrieda H.; Martin, Leigh Ann; Menon, Shailaja |
---|---|
Titel | Are There Alternatives in Reading Textbooks? An Examination of Three Beginning Reading Programs |
Quelle | In: Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21 (2005) 1, S.7-32 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1057-3569 |
Schlagwörter | Beginning Reading; Textbooks; Anthologies; Reading Programs; Phonics; Decoding (Reading); Textbook Content; Teaching Methods; Reading Instruction; Childrens Literature; Grade 1; Basal Reading |
Abstract | The first-grade components of three textbook programs--mainstream basal, combined phonics and literature, and phonics emphasis--were compared on cognitive load (e.g., number of different words) and linguistic content (e.g., number of monosyllabic, simple vowel words). Three levels of three components of a program--literature anthologies, decodable texts, and leveled texts--were compared. Texts of the mainstream basal program grew in length but had similar cognitive load and linguistic content across levels and components. The phonics and literature program had numerous decodable texts initially but, at later levels, emphasized a literary anthology and leveled texts that were similar to the mainstream basal program. The phonics-only program had decodable texts with small numbers of unique words. Its literature, however, had no clear connections to the words of decodable texts. (Author). |
Anmerkungen | Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420 (Toll Free); Fax: 215-625-8914. |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |