Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Fassin, Yves |
---|---|
Titel | The HF-rating as a universal complement to the h-index. |
Quelle | In: Scientometrics, (2020) 2, S.965-990
PDF als Volltext |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0138-9130 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-020-03611-5 |
Schlagwörter | Bibliometrics; Indicators; Index; Rating; Fractional counting; Normalization |
Abstract | Abstract Interdisciplinary comparison has been a constant objective of bibliometrics. The well-known h-index and its alternatives have not achieved this objective. Based on the gh-rating or ghent-rating, a categorization of academic articles into tiers of publications within similar citations ranges, a new ratio is proposed, the high fame hf-ratio. This ratio is calculated as the adjusted average of the weighted factors of the researchers’ best articles; it leads to an associated rating also designated by the symbols AAA, AA, A, BBB, B, C, D, … etc. comparable to financial ratings such as Moody’s and S&P ratings. Adding this rating to the h-index forms the high fame HF-rating. The HF-rating provides the average grade of a researcher’s best papers benchmarked in their field. This new HF-rating induces some qualitative elements in the evaluation of research, includes more selectivity and mitigates between classic h-indices. This universal HF-rating complements the well-known h-index with a relative indication of its influence in its field that also allows inter-field comparison. The methodology is illustrated with examples of researchers from different disciplines with different distributions of citations. |
Erfasst von | OLC |
Update | 2023/2/05 |