Examining Student Preferences of Group Work Evaluation Approaches: Evidence from Business Management Undergraduate Students

Autor/inn/en	Wagar, Terry H.; Carroll, Wendy R.
Titel	Examining Student Preferences of Group Work Evaluation Approaches: Evidence from Business Management Undergraduate Students
Quelle	In: Journal of Education for Business, 87 (2012) 6, S.358-362 (5 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0883-2323
DOI	10.1080/08832323.2011.628345
Schlagwörter	Evidence; Peer Evaluation; Undergraduate Students; Management Development; Groups; Questionnaires; Student Attitudes; Ethics; Business Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Evidenz; Fragebogen; Schülerverhalten; Ethik; Wirtschaftserziehung; Wirtschaftspädagogik
Abstract	Although there has been increased research attention on the development of peer evaluation instruments, there has been less emphasis on understanding student preferences for specific peer evaluation approaches. The authors used data from a study conducted with undergraduate students in management courses to examine student preferences of group work evaluation approaches and their perceptions about fairness, workload, and due process for each approach. The findings suggest that students prefer a confidential questionnaire to conduct peer evaluations and perceive it to be the fairest approach, although also reducing concerns for evaluating shared workload. However, there was evidence that student perceptions of due process in approaches without an instructor's involvement were lower. (Contains 3 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10