Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | DePascale, Charles A. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Managing Multiple Measures |
| Quelle | In: Principal, 91 (2012) 5, S.6-10 (5 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0271-6062 |
| Schlagwörter | Educational Indicators; Federal Programs; Educational Improvement; Teacher Evaluation; Federal Legislation; Educational Legislation; Accountability; Scores; Reliability; Principals; Administrators |
| Abstract | Regardless of how one might feel about the recent developments in teacher evaluation systems, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and adequate yearly progress (AYP), or student assessments for high-stakes promotion decisions, educators overwhelmingly agree that use of multiple measures is better than reliance on a single measure such as a large-scale, standardized assessment. In designing systems of multiple measures, however, it is critical to be aware of the different purposes of multiple measures and how those purposes impact the selection of measures, frequency of administration, aggregation of results across measures, and interpretation and use of results. All of the multiple measures available might not have been intended to meet the same purpose, and therefore, should be used and interpreted appropriately. (ERIC). |
| Anmerkungen | National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP). 1615 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Tel: 800-386-2377; Tel: 703-684-3345; Fax: 800-396-2377; e-mail: naesp@naesp.org; Web site: http://www.naesp.org |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
