Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Pannekoek, Linda; Rigoli, Daniela; Piek, Jan P.; Barrett, Nicholas C.; Schoemaker, Marina |
---|---|
Titel | The Revised DCDQ: Is It a Suitable Screening Measure for Motor Difficulties in Adolescents? |
Quelle | In: Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 29 (2012) 1, S.81-97 (7 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0736-5829 |
Schlagwörter | Adolescents; Psychometrics; Replication (Evaluation); Item Analysis; Screening Tests; Measurement Objectives; Measurement Techniques; Motor Reactions; Motor Development; Developmentally Appropriate Practices; Academic Achievement; Thinking Skills; Perceptual Motor Coordination; Movement Education; Adapted Physical Education |
Abstract | The parent-rated Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) has been revised to incorporate a wider age range, including adolescence. In this exploratory study, internal consistency and validity of the DCDQ-2007 was assessed using a community-based sample of 87 adolescents. Psychometric properties of the DCDQ-2007 were investigated and concurrent validity, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed with the MABC-2 as a criterion standard. The results demonstrated high internal consistency for the DCDQ-2007 and a relationship with the MABC-2 was found. The DCDQ-2007 met the recommended standard for sensitivity, although the confidence interval was large; however, it failed to meet the recommended standard for specificity. This has important implications concerning the suitability of the DCDQ-2007. Although promising psychometric properties were found within the current study, the applicability of the DCDQ-2007 as a screening measure for motor difficulties requires careful consideration. (Contains 6 tables.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Human Kinetics, Inc. 1607 North Market Street, Champaign, IL 61820. Tel: 800-474-4457; Fax: 217-351-1549; e-mail: info@hkusa.com; Web site: http://www.humankinetics.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |