Our Main Conclusion Stands: Reply to Rohling et al. (2011)

Autor/inn/en	McGrath, Robert E.; Kim, Brian H.; Hough, Leaetta
Titel	Our Main Conclusion Stands: Reply to Rohling et al. (2011)
Quelle	In: Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2011) 4, S.713-715 (3 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0033-2909
DOI	10.1037/a0023645
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Response Style (Tests); Bias; Test Validity; Research Methodology; Criticism; Academic Discourse; Neuropsychology; Evidence; Reader Response + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Antwortverhalten; Testvalidität; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Kritik; Discourse; Diskurs; Neuropsychologie; Evidenz; Leserbrief
Abstract	In their comment, M. L. Rohling et al. (2011) accused us of offering a "misleading" review of response bias. In fact, the additional findings they provided on this topic are relevant only to bias assessment in 1 of the domains we discussed, neuropsychological assessment. Furthermore, we contend that, even in that 1 domain, the additional findings they described do not merit revision of our conclusion that the data are insufficient for evaluating the status of bias indicators. We remain hopeful that our review will spur researchers to publish additional tests of the validity of bias indicators in real-world settings and reduce the reliance on analogue studies as an evidence base for their use. (Contains 4 footnotes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10