Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enGoodman, Kathleen M.; Magolda, Marcia Baxter; Seifert, Tricia A.; King, Patricia M.
TitelGood Practices for Student Learning: Mixed-Method Evidence from the Wabash National Study
QuelleIn: About Campus, 16 (2011) 1, S.2-9 (8 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1086-4822
DOI10.1002/abc.20048
SchlagwörterEvidence; Educational Experience; Liberal Arts; Inferences; Best Practices; Pretests Posttests; Outcomes of Education; College Outcomes Assessment; Expectation; Achievement Gains; Cultural Awareness; Instructional Effectiveness; Teacher Student Relationship; Student Development
AbstractSince 2006, 19 institutions across the United States have been trying to figure out how to work smarter through their participation in the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Drawing on data from the first year of the study, the robust, mixed-methods study the authors report in this article evaluated growth in the first year of college by surveying 4,501 students as they entered college and then again at the end of the first year. In a 2007 "About Campus" article explaining which learning outcomes were chosen as the focus of the study, Patricia King, Marie Kendall Brown, Nathan Lindsay, and JoNes VanHecke describe seven integrated learning outcomes associated with liberal arts education: (1) critical thinking; (2) moral reasoning; (3) psychological well-being; (4) socially responsible leadership; (5) intercultural development; (6) the inclination to inquire; and (7) integrative learning. Therefore, the measures used in the Wabash National Study were valid assessments focused on these outcomes. The research team also conducted qualitative interviews with 315 students at six of the institutions. During the interviews, the researchers asked students about the educational experiences that they regard as key to their growth and why these particular experiences are relevant. These data will be very helpful to institutions as they are called upon to provide evidence of student learning rather than student satisfaction. Those 19 institutions will have indisputable data that demonstrate how they have prepared their students for life after college. Just as importantly, they will be able to link those outcomes to specific campus practices--both in and out of the classroom--that spur the greatest growth on those outcomes. This is the information that will allow them to work smarter. In this article, the authors describe findings from the data and draw inferences to provide recommendations for practices that can be adapted on other campuses. (ERIC).
AnmerkungenJossey-Bass. Available from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "About Campus" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: