Phonology and Lexicon in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective: The Importance of Phonetics--A Commentary on Stoel-Gammon's "Relationships between Lexical and Phonological Development in Young Children"

Autor/inn/en	Bleses, Dorthe; Basboll, Hans; Lum, Jarrad; Vach, Werner
Titel	Phonology and Lexicon in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective: The Importance of Phonetics--A Commentary on Stoel-Gammon's "Relationships between Lexical and Phonological Development in Young Children"
Quelle	In: Journal of Child Language, 38 (2011) 1, S.61-68 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0305-0009
DOI	10.1017/S0305000910000437
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Language Research; Phonetics; Phonology; Vocabulary Skills; Vocabulary Development; North American English; Indo European Languages; Language Acquisition; Contrastive Linguistics; Child Language; Receptive Language; Foreign Countries; Linguistic Theory; Denmark + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Sprachforschung; Phonetik; Fonetik; Fonologie; Aktiver Wortschatz; Wortschatzarbeit; Amerikanisches Englisch; Indoeuropäisch; Sprachaneignung; Spracherwerb; Linguistics; Kontrastive Linguistik; 'Children''s language'; Kindersprache; Rezeptive Kommunikationsfähigkeit; Ausland; Linguistische Theorie; Dänemark
Abstract	In her interesting article, Stoel-Gammon (this issue) reviews studies concerning the interactions between lexical and phonological development. While the focus of the review is on vocabulary production from children acquiring American English, she also suggests that cross-linguistic research be undertaken to examine how universal and language-specific properties affect the interaction between lexical and phonological acquisition. In this regard, Stoel-Gammon referred to the study of Bleses "et al." (2008) who found differences in receptive vocabulary development across languages, based on norming studies for the Communicative Development Inventories (Fenson, Marchman, Thal, Dale, Reznick & Bates, 2007). Bleses "et al." showed that Danish children were slower in the early comprehension of words (and phrases). It was hypothesized that the phonetic structure of Danish may account for the difference in receptive vocabulary skills in this population (Bleses & Basboll, 2004). (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Cambridge University Press. The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8RU, UK. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Tel: +44-1223-326070; Fax: 845-353-4141; Fax: +44-1223-325150; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: http://www.cambridge.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10