Embedding Local Places in Global Spaces: Geographical Indications as a Territorial Development Strategy

Autor/in	Bowen, Sarah
Titel	Embedding Local Places in Global Spaces: Geographical Indications as a Territorial Development Strategy
Quelle	In: Rural Sociology, 75 (2010) 2, S.209-243 (35 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0036-0112
DOI	10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00007.x
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Agribusiness; Agricultural Production; Agriculture; Global Approach; International Trade; Comparative Analysis; Economic Development; Government Role; Rural Farm Residents; Agricultural Occupations; Local Issues; Geographic Location; Political Issues; Organizational Effectiveness; Marketing; Rural Economics; Merchandise Information; France; Mexico + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Agrarindustrie; Agriculture; Production; Landwirtschaft; Produktion; Agrarproduktion; Landwirtschaftliche Produktion; Globales Denken; Trade; International relations; Handel; Internationale Beziehungen; Wirtschaftsentwicklung; Occupation; Beruf; Landwirtschaftlicher Beruf; Politischer Faktor; Unternehmenserfolg; Frankreich; Mexiko
Abstract	Geographical indications (GIs) are place-based names that convey the geographical origin, as well as the cultural and historical identity, of agricultural products. GIs are unique, in that they provide a means of ensuring that control over production and sales of a product stays within a local area, but at the same time they make use of extralocal markets. Although control over GIs largely rests with local actors, GIs are nested in wider regional, national, and international networks; and the passage from local to extralocal markets introduces new costs and benefits and new relations of power into the supply chain. The degree to which GI protection spurs development and protects local environmental and cultural resources depends on the structure of the GI legislation and on the territorial context in which protection is embedded. Using a commodity-chains approach, I compare two GI production systems, tequila in Mexico and Comte cheese in France, in order to develop a theory of the factors that contribute to more sustainable, equitable GI production systems. I argue that three key differences in the design of the GI schemes help to explain the varying effects of the two cases: (1) the manner in which supply-chain actors define quality, (2) the way that the GI valorizes the "terroir" of the region, and (3) the strength and cohesion that the collective organizing body exhibits. Moreover, the institutional and political context in which GI supply chains "touch down" plays a critical role. Contrary to a conceptualization of GIs as compatible with a purely market-oriented model, my comparison of these two cases indicates that some level of state involvement, in order to level the playing field and empower small farmers, is a necessary, although not sufficient, precondition for successful and sustainable GIs. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: https://secure.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/112782101
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10