Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Lefebre, Elizabeth; Fabrizio, Michael; Merbitz, Charles |
|---|---|
| Titel | Accuracy and Efficiency of Data Interpretation: A Comparison of Data Display Methods |
| Quelle | In: Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 24 (2008), S.2-20 (19 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1088-484X |
| Schlagwörter | Educational Research; Data Interpretation; Efficiency; Comparative Analysis; Graphs; Tables (Data); Charts; Intervals; Reliability; Behavioral Science Research; Intermode Differences; Data Analysis; Management Information Systems; Prediction |
| Abstract | Although behavior analysis relies primarily on visual inspection for interpreting data, previous research shows that the method of display can influence the judgments. In the current study, 26 Board-Certified Behavior Analysts reviewed two data sets displayed on each of three methods--equal-interval graphs, tables, and Standard Celeration Charts--and determined which data set showed more change per unit of time and which showed less variability. Regardless of their preference for one method of display, participants handled data displayed on the Standard Celeration Chart most efficiently. However, the accuracy of their judgments across all types of data display was low and may indicate the need for additional training, even for persons holding the Board-Certified Behavior Analyst credential. (Contains 5 tables, 6 figures and 1 footnote.) (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Standard Celeration Society. e-mail: journal@celeration.org; Web site: http://www.celeration.org |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
