Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Graney, Suzanne Bamonto; Martinez, Rebecca S.; Missall, Kristen N.; Aricak, O. Tolga |
---|---|
Titel | Universal Screening of Reading in Late Elementary School: R-CBM versus CBM Maze |
Quelle | In: Remedial and Special Education, 31 (2010) 5, S.368-377 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0741-9325 |
DOI | 10.1177/0741932509338371 |
Schlagwörter | Curriculum Based Assessment; Screening Tests; Predictive Validity; Comparative Analysis; Reading Tests; Educational Diagnosis; Item Analysis; Replication (Evaluation); Elementary School Students; Prereferral Intervention; Longitudinal Studies; Reading Ability |
Abstract | Two curriculum-based measurement tools are commonly used to assess progress in reading in elementary school: R-CBM and CBM maze. R-CBM is used in practice more frequently than CBM maze is, although CBM maze is more time efficient to administer than R-CBM is. The technical adequacy of each of these measures has been reported in the literature; however, a comparative analysis of their technical adequacy has not been published. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical adequacy of R-CBM and CBM maze to inform their use in a universal screening program of reading in fourth and fifth grades. Results suggest evidence of short- and long-term alternate forms reliability, criterion validity, and predictive validity for both R-CBM and CBM maze, supporting the possibility that the two measures are comparable for use in universal screening at those grade levels. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |