Testing for Measurement and Structural Equivalence in Large-Scale Cross-Cultural Studies: Addressing the Issue of Nonequivalence

Autor/inn/en	Byrne, Barbara M.; van de Vijver, Fons J. R.
Titel	Testing for Measurement and Structural Equivalence in Large-Scale Cross-Cultural Studies: Addressing the Issue of Nonequivalence
Quelle	In: International Journal of Testing, 10 (2010) 2, S.107-132 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1530-5058
Schlagwörter	Measures (Individuals); Cross Cultural Studies; Measurement; Comparative Analysis; Structural Equation Models; College Students; Foreign Countries; Validity; Factor Structure; Statistical Bias; Algeria; Brazil; Bulgaria; Canada; Chile; Cyprus; France; Georgia Republic; Germany; Ghana; Greece; Hong Kong; India; Indonesia; Iran; Japan; Mexico; Netherlands; Nigeria; Pakistan; Saudi Arabia; South Korea; Spain; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom; United States + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Messdaten; Cultural comparison; Kulturvergleich; Messverfahren; Collegestudent; Ausland; Gültigkeit; Faktorenstruktur; Algerien; Brasilien; Bulgarien; Kanada; Zypern; Frankreich; Deutschland; Griechenland; Hongkong; Indien; Indonesien; Mexiko; Niederlande; Saudi-Arabien; Korea; Republik; Spanien; Türkei; Großbritannien; USA
Abstract	A critical assumption in cross-cultural comparative research is that the instrument measures the same construct(s) in exactly the same way across all groups (i.e., the instrument is measurement and structurally equivalent). Structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures are commonly used in testing these assumptions of multigroup equivalence. However, when comparisons comprise large-scale cross-cultural studies, the standard SEM strategy can be extremely problematic both statistically and substantively. Based on responses to a 14-item version of the Family Values Scale (Georgas, 1999) by 5,482 university students from 27 nations around the globe, we describe and illustrate these difficulties. We propose and report on a dual modal two-pronged strategy that focuses on countries as well as scale items in determining the possible sources of bias. Suggestions for minimizing problems in tests for multigroup equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies are proffered. (Contains 4 tables, 1 figure, and 9 notes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10