Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Hoagwood, Kimberly E.; Cavaleri, Mary A.; Olin, S. Serene; Burns, Barbara J.; Slaton, Elaine; Gruttadaro, Darcy; Hughes, Ruth |
---|---|
Titel | Family Support in Children's Mental Health: A Review and Synthesis |
Quelle | In: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13 (2010) 1, S.1-45 (45 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1096-4037 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10567-009-0060-5 |
Schlagwörter | Research Methodology; Family Programs; Mental Health; Health Services; Mental Disorders; Disabilities; Children; National Organizations; Advocacy; Program Evaluation; Program Content; Classification; Social Support Groups; Information Sources Research method; Forschungsmethode; Family program; Familienprogramm; Psychohygiene; Health service; Gesundheitsdienst; Gesundheitswesen; Mental illness; Geisteskrankheit; Handicap; Behinderung; Child; Kind; Kinder; Sozialanwaltschaft; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Programmgestaltung; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Social support; Soziale Unterstützung; Information source; Informationsquelle |
Abstract | A comprehensive review of structured family support programs in children's mental health was conducted in collaboration with leadership from key national family organizations. The goals were to identify typologies of family support services for which evaluation data existed and identify research gaps. Over 200 programs were examined; 50 met criteria for inclusion. Programs were categorized by whether they were delivered by peer family members, clinicians, or teams. Five salient components of family support were identified: (a) informational, (b) instructional, (c) emotional, (d) instrumental, and (e) advocacy. Clinician-led programs were heavily represented (n = 33, 66%), followed by family-led (n = 11, 22%), and team-delivered (n = 6, 12%) programs. Key differences between programs delivered by clinicians or by peer family members were found in the degree of emphasis, research methodology, and outcomes. However, the content of the components was similar across all three program types. There are both important differences in emphasis across typologies of family support provided by clinicians, family members, or teams as well as important similarities in content. Family-delivered support may be an important adjunct to existing services for parents, although the research base remains thin. A research agenda to promote more rigorous evaluations of these services especially those delivered by peer family members is critical. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |